PENDAMPINGAN PERENCANAAN PEMBELAJARAN TERDIFERENSIASI UNTUK GURU SEKOLAH DASAR DI SUKASADA, BULELENG

Penulis

  • I Nyoman Indhi Wiradika Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha
  • Gede Surya Mahendra Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha
  • I Nyoman Sutrisna Angga Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha

Kata Kunci:

literasi dan numerasi, pembelajaran terdiferensiasi, pengembangan profesional, efektivitas pelatihan, uji Wilcoxon

Abstrak

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengevaluasi efektivitas pelatihan dan pendampingan pembelajaran terdiferensiasi dalam meningkatkan kemampuan pengajaran terdiferensiasi guru di sekolah dasar dalam konteks pembelajaran literasi dan numerasi. Asesmen literasi dan numerasi merupakan komponen penting dalam mengukur kompetensi dasar peserta didik, yang mencakup kemampuan membaca, berhitung, serta interpretasi dan penggunaan informasi dalam konteks sehari-hari. Data dari pelaksanaan diuji menggunakan Wilcoxon signed-rank menunjukkan peningkatan signifikan antara skor pre-test dan post-test, terutama pada guru yang sudah bersertifikasi. Rata-rata skor pre-test 8.70 meningkat menjadi 9.40 pada post-test, mengindikasikan bahwa pelatihan efektif dalam memperkuat keterampilan guru dalam menerapkan strategi pembelajaran yang lebih responsif terhadap kebutuhan siswa. Kesimpulan ini menunjukkan pentingnya program pengembangan profesional yang berkelanjutan dan kontekstual berbasis data dalam mendukung keberhasilan penerapan pembelajaran terdiferensiasi di sekolah.

Referensi

Adem, A. M., Wiradika, I. N. I., & Yusron, E. (2024). The Use of Socioeconomic Status (SES) in PEMANTIK Instrument: How Parental Education and Occupation Explain the Relationship with Children Literacy and Numeracy Achievement? In P. C. Kuswandi, E. Apino, S. Ramadhan, R. Susetyaningsih, & S. Widiastuti (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Current Issues in Education (ICCIE) 2023 (Vol. 847, pp. 82–91). Atlantis Press SARL. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-245-3_10

Corley, M.A. (2005). Differentiated Instruction: Adjusting to the Needs of All Learners. Focus on Basic, 7(C), 13–16.

Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective Teacher Professional Development. Learning Policy Institute.

Dohn, N. B. (2007). Knowledge and Skills for PISA?Assessing the Assessment. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 41(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9752.2007.00542.x

Grotlüschen, A., Desjardins, R., & Liu, H. (2020). Literacy and numeracy: Global and comparative perspectives. International Review of Education, 66(2–3), 127–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-020-09854-x

Guskey, T. R. (2003). What Makes Professional Development Effective? Phi Delta Kappan, 84(10), 748–750.

Hersi, A. A., & Bal, I. A. (2021). PLANNING FOR DIFFERENTIATION: UNDERSTANDING MARYLAND TEACHERS’ DESIRED AND ACTUAL USE OF DIFFERENTIATED INSTRUCTION. Educational Planning, 28(1).

Lang, M. L. (2019). PLANNING FOR DIFFERENTIATED INSTRUCTION: INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP PRACTICES PERCEIVED BY ADMINISTRATORS AND TEACHERS IN MIDDLE SCHOOLS. Educational Planning, 26(2).

Lundetræ, K, Sulkunen, S., Gabrielsen, E., & Malin, A. (2014). A comparison of PIAAC and PISA results. In Associations between age and cognitive foundation skills in the Nordic countries. Finnish Institute for Educational Research.

Rahmah, A. N., & Putri, R. F. (2023). Literacy, Numeracy, and Scientific Literacy Levels for Junior High School Students in Banjarmasin. Journal of Educations, 2(1).

Rohmah, A. N., Sutama, S., Hidayati, Y. M., Fauziati, E., & Rahmawati, L. E. (2022). Planning for Cultivation Numerical Literacy in Mathematics Learning for Minimum Competency Assessment (AKM) in Elementary Schools. Mimbar Sekolah Dasar, 9(3), 503–516. https://doi.org/10.53400/mimbar-sd.v9i3.51774

Shiel, G., Moran, G., Cosgrove, J., & Perkins, R. (2010). A Summary of the Performance of Students in Ireland on the PISA 2009 Test of Mathematical Literacy and a Comparison with Performance in 2003.

Thomson, S., Bortoli, L.D., & Buckley, S. (2013). PISA 2012: How Australia measures up. Australian Council for Educational Research.

Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). The Differentiated Classroom: Responding to the Needs of All Learners. ASCD.

Van Garderen, D., & Whittaker, C. (2006). Planning Differentiated, Multicultural Instruction for Secondary Inclusive Classrooms. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 38(3), 12–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005990603800302

Watts‐Taffe, S., (Barbara) Laster, B. P., Broach, L., Marinak, B., McDonald Connor, C., & Walker‐Dalhouse, D. (2012). Differentiated Instruction: Making Informed Teacher Decisions. The Reading Teacher, 66(4), 303–314. https://doi.org/10.1002/TRTR.01126

Yusron, E., Wiradika, I.N.I, & Adem, A.M.G. (2022). Deteksi Bias Gender Pada Soal Literasi dan Numerasi: Konteks Soal Seperti Apa untuk Level Awal? Pusat Studi Pendidikan dan Kebijakan. https://pemantik.or.id/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Kilas-Pemantik.pdf

Unduhan

Diterbitkan

01-12-2024

Terbitan

Bagian

##section.default.title##