Empowering Education: Integrating Critical Pedagogy into Transformative Teaching Strategies
Keywords:
Critical Pedagogy, Educational Empowerment, Teaching StrategiesAbstract
The objective of this study is to explore the implications and effectiveness of critical pedagogy in fostering social justice and empowering students in educational settings. The gap in understanding on how critical pedagogy can advance social justice and empower students in learning. 21st-century skills and teaching strategies are connected to critical pedagogy approaches that promote skills such as critical thinking and collaboration. Teaching strategies integrated with critical pedagogy encourage student-centered learning and active participation, preparing students to critically and independently address the demands of the modern era in advocating for social justice. This research adopts a qualitative approach, employing literature review to examine the implementation and outcomes of critical pedagogy in various educational contexts The study findings reveal that critical pedagogy serves as a powerful tool for challenging societal norms, empowering marginalized individuals, and promoting social justice within educational settings. Through student-centered learning, collaborative problem-solving, and the development of 21st-century skills, critical pedagogy equips students with the tools and mindset necessary to critically evaluate their surroundings and take action to address oppressive conditions in society. Furthermore, the research highlights the pivotal role of teachers in facilitating critical inquiry, fostering dialogue, and promoting social justice within the classroom. By engaging in self-reflection and transformative practice, educators can create inclusive learning environments that empower students to become active agents in their education and advocates for positive change in society.
References
Aksakalli, A. (2018). The Effects of Science Teaching based on Critical Pedagogy Principles on the Classroom Climate. Science Education International, 29(4), 250–260.
Ambarita, R. A., Yunastiti, & Indriayu, M. (2019). The Application of Group Investigation Based on Hands-on Activities to Improve Learning Outcomes Based on Higher Order Thinking Skills of Students at SMA Negeri 2 Pematangsianta. Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education (BirLE)
Ares, N. (2006). Political aims and classroom dynamics: Generative processes in classroom communities. Radical Pedagogy, 8(2), 12-20.
Baker, L., & Brown, A.L. (1984). Metacognitive skills and reading. In P.D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 353-394). New York: Longman.
Barron, B., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2008). Teaching for meaningful learning: A review of research on inquiry-based and cooperative learning. In L. Darling-Hammond et al. (Eds.), Powerful Learning: What We Know About Teaching for Understanding. San Francisco, Calif., Jossey-Bass/John Wiley & Sons.
Beardsley, M., Albó, L., Aragón, P., & Hernández-Leo, D. (2021). Emergency education effects on teacher abilities and motivation to use digital technologies. British Journal of Educational Technology.
Biletska, I. O., Paladieva, A. F., Avchinnikova, H. D., & Kazak, Y. Y. (2021). The use of modern technologies by foreign language teachers: Developing digital skills. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S2), 16–27.
Bilotta, E., Bertacchini, F., Gabriele, L., Giglio, S., Pantano, P. S., & Romita, T. (2021). Industry 4.0 technologies in tourism education: Nurturing students to think with technology. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 29, 100275.
Bransford, J., Sherwood, R., Vye, N., & Rieser, J. (1986). Teaching thinking and problem solving: Research foundations. American Psychologist, 41, 1078-1089.
Brierley, Gary; Devonshire, Liz and Hillman, Mick; “Learning to Participate: Responding to Changes in Australian Land and Water Management Policy and Practice”, in Australian Journal of Environmental Education, vol. 18, 2002, pp. 7-13.
Camilleri, M. A., & Camilleri, A. C. (2017). Digital learning resources and ubiquitous technologies in education. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 22(1), 65–82.
Cavas, B., Cavas, P., Karaoglan, B., & Kisla, T. (2009). A study on science teachers’ attitudes toward information and communications technologies in education. Online Submission, 8(2).
Chou, C. (2003). Interactivity and interactive functions in web-based learning systems: A technical framework for designers. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(3), 265–279.
Crawford-Lange, L. M. (1982). Curricular alternatives for second-language learning, in T. V. Higgs (Ed.) Curriculum Competence and the Foreign Language Teacher. Skokie: National Textbook Company.
Degener, S. (2001). Making sense of critical pedagogy in adult literacy education. In J. Comings, B. Garner, & C. Smith (Eds.), Review of adult learning and literacy (pp. 26-62). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Dewey, J. (1963). Experience and Education. New York: Collier Books.
Dreimane, S., & Upenieks, R. (2022). Intersection of serious games and learning motivation for medical education: A literature review. In Research Anthology on Developments in Gamification and Game-Based Learning (pp. 1938–1947).
Emmanuel, G., & Sife, A. (2008). Challenges of managing information and communication technologies for education: Experiences from Sokoine National Agricultural Library. International Journal of Education and Development using ICT, 4(3).
Freire, P. (1973). Education for Critical Consciousness. Seabury Press.
Freire, P. (1998). Teachers as Cultural Workers: Letters to Those Who Dare to Teach. Westview Press.
Freire, P. (2014). Pedagogy of commitment (Terjemahan oleh D. Brookshaw & A. Oliveira). Paradigm Publishers.
Freire, P. (2004). Pedagogy of indignation. Paradigm Publishers.
Gijsbers, G., & van Schoonhoven, B. (2012). The future of learning: A foresight study on new ways to learn new skills for future jobs. European Foresight Platform (EFP) Brief, No. 222. www.foresight-platform.eu/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/EFPBrief-No.-222_Future-of-Learning.pdf
Gilbert, L., & Moore, D. R. (1998). Building interactivity into web courses: Tools for social and instructional interaction. Educational Technology, 3(83), 29–35.
Giroux, H. A. (1997). Pedagogy and the Politics of Hope: Theory, Culture, and Schooling. A Critical Reader. Westview Press.
Giroux, H. A., & McLaren, P. (1992). Writing from the margins: Geographies of identity, pedagogy, and power. Journal of Education, 174(1), 7-30.
Haddad, W. D., & Draxler, A. (2002). The dynamics of technologies for education. In Technologies for Education Potentials, Parameters, and Prospects (Vol. 1, pp. 2–17).
Hillman, D.C., Willis, D.J., & Gunawardena, C.N. (1994). Learner-interface interaction in distance education: An extension of contemporary models and strategies for practitioners. The American Journal of Distance Education, 8(2), 30–42.
I Gusti Ayu Sundari Meyanti, Putu Kerti Nitiasih & Putu Nanci Riastin. (2022). Analysis of Implementation Critical and Cyber Pedagogy: A Review. Synesis, 15(2). ISSN 1984-6754. © Universidade Católica de Petrópolis, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.
Kartono. (2010). Hands on activity pada pembelajaran geometri sekolah sebagai assesmen kinerja siswa. Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif.
Kaya, C., & Kaya, S. (2017). Perspective teachers’ education belief and their views about the principles of critical pedagogy. Journal of Education and Learning, 6(4), 181-190.
Keengwe, J., & Bhargava, M. (2014). Mobile learning and integration of mobile technologies in education. Education and Information Technologies, 19(4), 737–746.
Kincheloe, J. L. (2005). Critical Pedagogy Primer. Peter Lang Publishing.
Kincheloe, J. L., & McLaren, P. (1994). Rethinking critical theory and qualitative research. In: N. Denzin, and Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 138-157.
Kostopoulos, G., & Kotsiantis, S. (2022). Exploiting semi-supervised learning in the education field: A critical survey. In Advances in Machine Learning/Deep Learning-Based Technologies (pp. 79–94).
Leadbeater, C., & Wong, A. (2010). Learning from the Extremes: A White Paper. San Jose, Calif., Cisco Systems Inc.
Learnovation. (2009). Inspiring Young People to Become Lifelong Learners in 2025. Vision Paper 1. Brussels, MENON, pp. 1-12. www.menon.org.gr/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Learnovation-Vision-Paper-1_Learning-at-School-Ages1.pdf
Liaw, S. S., & Huang, H. M. (2000). Enhancing interactivity in web-based instruction: A review of the literature. Educational Technology, 40(3), 41–45.
Lohr, L.L. (2000). Designing the instructional interface. Computers in Human Behavior, 16(2), 161–182.
Mahmoodarabi, M., & Khodabakhsh, M. R. (2015). Critical pedagogy: EFL teachers’ views, experience and academic degrees. English Language Teaching, 8(6), 100–110. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v8n6p100
Mahmoudi, A., Khoshnood, A., & Babael, A. (2014). Paulo Freire’s critical pedagogy and its implication in curriculum planning. Journal of Education and Practices, 5(14), 86-92.
Manorom, K., & Pollock, Z. (2006). Role Play as a Teaching Method: A Practical Guide. The Mekong Learning Initiative and the Mekong Sub-region Social Research Centre, Faculty of Liberal Arts, Ubon Ratchathani University.
Markman, E.M. (1985). Comprehension monitoring: Developmental and educational issues. In S.F. Chipman, J.W. Segal, & R. Glaser (Eds.), Thinking and learning skills: Vol. 2. Research and open questions (pp. 275-291). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
McLaren, P. (1998). Che: The pedagogy of Che Guevara: Critical pedagogy and globalization thirty years after Che. Cultural Circles, 3, 29–103.
Moallem, M. (2003). An interactive online course: A collaborative design model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51(4), 85–103.
Nanjundaswamy, C., Baskaran, S., & Leela, M. H. (2021). Digital Pedagogy for Sustainable Learning. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 9(3), 179–185.
Nurhabibah, & Richardus Eko Indrajit. (2021). Cyber Pedagogy: Pendampingan Guru yang Tepat di Era Digital. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Andi.
Ohara, Y., Saft, S., & Crookes, G. (2000). Teacher Exploration of Feminist Critical Pedagogy in Beginning Japanese as a Foreign Language Class. Paper presented at the University of Hawai’i, Manoa.
Okazaki, T. (2005). Critical consciousness and critical language teaching. Second Language Studies, 23(2), 174-202.
Özaydınlık, K. P., & Sağlık, M. A. (2021). Teachers’ approaches to the principles of critical pedagogy: A mixed-method study. Psycho-Educational Research Reviews, 10(2), 126–141.
Paul, S. (2017). Filsafat Konstruksivisme dalam Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Pikhart, M., Al-Obaydi, L. H., & Tawafak, R. M. (2022). The Implementation of Critical Pedagogy in Digital Second Language Acquisition in Higher Education: Age and Gender Differences. Computer-Assisted Language Learning Electronic Journal (CALL-EJ), 23(2), 56-75.
Punie, Y., & Cabrera, M. (2006). The Future of ICT and Learning in the Knowledge Society: Report on a Joint DGJRC-DG EAC Workshop held in Seville, 20-21 October 2005. Luxembourg, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
Qureshi, M. I., Khan, N., Raza, H., Imran, A., & Ismail, F. (2021). Digital Technologies in Education 4.0. Does it Enhance the Effectiveness of Learning? International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 15(4).
Redecker, C., Ala-Mutka, K., & Punie, Y. (2010). Learning 2.0 – The Impact of Social Media on Learning in Europe: Policy Brief. JRC Technical Notes. Luxembourg, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
Rogers, P. L. (2000). Barriers to adopting emerging technologies in education. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 22(4), 455–472.
Saavedra, A., & Opfer, V. (2012). Teaching and Learning 21st Century Skills: Lessons from the Learning Sciences. A Global Cities Education Network Report. New York, Asia Society.
Schugurensky, D. (2014). Paulo Freire. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Shuell, T. J. (2015). Teaching and learning as problem solving. Theory Into Practice.
Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R & D. IKAP.
Uddin, M. S. (2019). Critical Pedagogy and its Implication in the Classroom. Journal of Underrepresented and Minority Progress, 3(2), 109-119. Retrieved from
Vakaliuk, T. A., Spirin, O. M., Lobanchykova, N. M., Martseva, L. A., Novitska, I. V., & Kontsedailo, V. V. (2021, March). Features of distance learning of cloud technologies for the quarantine organisation’s educational process. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1840(1), 012051.
Vrasidas, C. (2000). Constructivism versus objectivism: Implications for interaction, course design, and evaluation in distance education. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 6(4), 339–362.
Wang, Q.Y. (2007). Evaluation of online courses developed in China. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 5(2), 4–12. Retrieved April 15, 2008, from link
Wena, M. (2012). Strategi Pembelajaran Inovatif Kontemporer. Jakarta: BumiAksara.
Xu, S.-R., & Zhou, S.-N. (2022). The Effect Of Students ’ Attitude Towards Science, Technology, Engineering, And Mathematics On 21st Century Learning Skills: A Structural EquatioN. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 21(4), 706–719.
Downloads
Published
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Dewa Made Dwikamayuda
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
